|
Ads

* Kindle eBook on Diabetes
*
NOOK eBook on Diabetes
* Other eBook Formats
12 Powerfoods to Beat Diabetes
Can controlling your blood sugar and preventing diabetes complications be as
simple as eating the right foods? Yes. Certain foods are packed with
nutrients that stabilize blood sugar levels, protect your heart, and even
save your vision from the damaging effects of diabetes. These 12 foods can
give you an extra edge against diabetes and its complications.
Apples 1. Apples
In a Finnish study, men who ate the most apples and other foods high in
quercetin had 20 percent less diabetes and heart disease deaths. Other good
sources of quercetin are onions, tomatoes, leafy green vegetables, and
berries.
Cinnamon 2. Cinnamon
A study at the Human Nutrition Research Center in Beltsville, Maryland,
found that if you use ½ teaspoon of cinnamon daily, it can make cells more
sensitive to insulin. Therefore, the study says, the cells convert blood
sugar to energy.
After 40 days of taking various amount of cinnamon extract, diabetics
experienced not only lower blood sugar spikes after eating, but major
improvements in signs of heart health. And you can sprinkle cinnamon on just
about anything.
Citrus Fruit 3. Citrus Fruit
Studies show that people with diabetes tend to have lower levels of vitamin
C in their bodies, so antioxidant-packed citrus fruit is a great snack
choice. It may seem quicker to get your C from a pill, but since fruit is
low in fat, high in fiber, and delivers lots of other healthy nutrients,
it's a better choice.
Salmon 4. Cold-Water Fish
Heart disease strikes people with diabetes twice as often as it does people
without the illness, according to the American Diabetes Association. Diets
high in omega-3 fatty acids—the "good fat" in cold-water fish such as wild
Alaskan salmon, sardines, and Atlantic mackerel—can help lower
artery-clogging LDL cholesterol and triglycerides while raising levels of
HDL (good) cholesterol.
Fiber-Rich Foods 5. Fiber-Rich Foods
A study at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center found that
people who increased their fiber intake from 24 to 50 g daily had dramatic
improvements in blood sugar levels. In fact, the high-fiber diet was as
effective as some diabetes medications.
Rather than try to figure out exactly how much fiber is in different foods,
focus on trying to get a total of 13 daily servings of a mixture of fruits,
vegetables, beans, brown rice, and whole grain pastas, cereals, and breads.
Beans 6. Legumes
Legumes of all sorts—chickpeas, cannelloni beans, kidney beans, and
lentils—are a great addition to soups, salads, and a variety of ethnic
dishes. And this low-fat, low-calorie, high-fiber, high-protein food helps
to reduce risk of diabetes and heart disease. The fiber slows the release of
glucose into your bloodstream, which prevents the blood sugar spikes that
worsen diabetes blood sugar control and make you feel hungry.
Green Tea 7. Green Tea
Studies show that chronic inflammation—caused by high-fat foods, lack of
exercise, and eating too few fruits, vegetables, and good fats—can increase
risk of hearts attacks and thwart the body's ability to absorb blood sugar.
A simple solution: Drink green tea and orange or cranberry juice. They're
all packed with flavonoids—powerful inflammation-fighters. Swap one in for
one cup of coffee a day.
Nuts 8. Nuts
Studies show that people who eat nuts regularly have lower rates of heart
disease than people who don't eat them. (People with diabetes are at
increased risk of heart disease.) Even among the healthiest eaters, the ones
who also eat nuts boast the best health record. Exactly why isn't known yet,
but one reason could be compounds called tocotrienols.
The key to eating nuts is not to eat too many; they're so high in calories
that you could easily see the aftermath pouring over your pants. Either
measure 2 tablespoons of nuts, count how many it is, and limit yourself to
that number, or keep a jar of chopped nuts on hand. Sprinkle 2 tablespoons a
day on cereal, yogurt, veggies, salads, or wherever the flavor appeals to
you.
Kale 9. Spinach, Kale, and Collard Greens
All of these green leafy vegetables are good sources of lutein, a carotenoid
that's good for the eyes. That's especially important because people with
diabetes may develop debilitating eye problems as complications of the
disease. These foods are also great sources of fiber, B vitamins, iron,
calcium, and vitamin C.
Chocolate 10. Chocolate
Researchers at Tufts University discovered that dark chocolate improves
insulin sensitivity, a crucial improvement in preventing or treating type 2
diabetes. What's more, dark—but not white—chocolate also produced a
significant drop in blood pressure, reduced LDL (bad) cholesterol, and
improved blood vessel function.
Just don't overdo it. Dark chocolate is great for the occasional indulgence,
but it still packs a lot of fat and calories.
Steak 11. Steak
There's something in steak besides the protein, iron, and B vitamins that's
good for us. It's a compound that's part of beef's fat profile called
conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Doctors Michael Murray and Michael Lyon
point out in their book Beat Diabetes Naturally that experiments have shown
that CLA works to correct impaired blood sugar metabolism and also appears
to have significant anti-cancer properties.
In the most recent research, scientists in Norway supplemented the diets of
180 people with a few grams of CLA and reported that they lost 9 percent of
their body weight in one year. For a 200-pounder, that's an 18-pound weight
loss!
To get CLA from steak, choose meat from range-fed beef. Eating natural
pasturage give these animals far more healthful CLA than the usual
grain-rich diet. And keep portions to 3 or 4 ounces.
Vinegar 12. Vinegar
Two tablespoons of vinegar taken before a meal can help your blood sugar go
down. A study at Arizona State University East tested three different groups
of people to see what the results would be in healthy people, those with
prediabetes (they had signs diabetes was developing), and confirmed
diabetics. Before each of two meals a day, the subjects were given 2
tablespoons of ordinary vinegar.
The results: An hour after the vinegar treatment, the diabetics had blood
sugar levels that were 25 percent lower than without vinegar. The
prediabetics had an even better result: Their levels were lower by about
half
Statin drugs might slightly boost diabetes risk
>By David Douglas
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) -
Cholesterol-lowering statin drugs do not reduce the risk of diabetes and
might modestly elevate the chances of developing the condition, researchers
found in a pooled analysis of trial data.
"Contrary to our expectation," lead
investigator Dr. Swapnil Rajpathak told Reuters Health, "we did not find any
benefit of statins on diabetes risk. In fact, there is a suggestion that
statins may be associated with increased risk -- which needs to be explored
further."
The role of statins in lowering high
cholesterol and protecting the heart is well established, but their
relationship with diabetes is controversial, Rajpathak of Albert Einstein
College of Medicine, New York and colleagues note in the journal Diabetes
Care. One Scottish trial reported a small protective effect of statins on
diabetes.
To investigate further, the researchers
pooled data from this trial and five other randomized placebo-controlled
trials of statins involving a total of more than 57,000 adults.
After an average follow-up of 3.9 years,
2,082 participants developed diabetes. When data from the Scottish trial
were excluded, there appeared to be a small but significant 13 percent
increased relative risk of diabetes developing in those who received statin
therapy. When the Scottish trial was included in the analysis, the risk of
diabetes with statin therapy was attenuated (6 percent increased risk).
However, the researchers emphasize that
there were a number of possible factors that may have influenced the
results.
In addition, Rajpathak stressed that the
benefits of statins on heart disease "by far outweigh any detrimental
effects on ... diabetes risk."
In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Christie
M. Ballantyne of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas and colleagues
agree, pointing out that if future studies confirm such a connection,
"Because cardiovascular disease accounts for almost two-thirds of deaths in
people with diabetes, the protective effect of statins on this major
complication may suffice to support their use despite a potential risk of
new-onset diabetes."
SOURCE: Diabetes Care, October 2009.
International Diabetes Foundation outlines new diabetes
guidelines
Submitted by WWAY on 22 October 2009 - 4:01pm.READ
MORE:
The International Diabetes Federation reports that over
285 million people worldwide now live with diabetes and they predict that
within 20 years that number will jump to 435 million.
In order to equip health care professionals with the
latest guidance in diabetes care, the federation recently released new
clinical guidelines that cover topics such as gestational diabetes and
proper use of at-home blood glucose testing.
Though monitoring blood glucose levels at home was
previously suggested only for those diabetics taking insulin injections, the
guidelines recommend that those who manage their diabetes through oral
medication should also keep track of their blood glucose at home.
The
report also offers the federation's first-ever guidelines on diabetes
and pregnancy, and advises that diabetic women wishing to conceive
should get pre-pregnancy advice from doctors, consider stopping oral
blood sugar medications and certain blood pressure medications, and
begin folic acid therapy. Concerning gestational diabetes, which has
become increasingly common in the past years, the report says that early
action is key and any pregnant woman who tests abnormal for blood sugar
levels should be considered for diabetes treatment.
Eating white and oily fish
regularly may provide protection against type 2 diabetes
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Eating white
and oily fish regularly may provide protection against type 2 diabetes, but
eating shellfish may have the opposite effect, a study from the UK hints.
The study team noted about 25 percent less
risk type 2 diabetes among men and women who reported eating one or more, as
opposed to fewer, servings of white or oily fish each week.
Unexpectedly, however, they found that men
and women who ate similar amounts of shellfish -- primarily prawns, crab,
and mussels -- had about 36 percent increased risk of developing type 2
diabetes.
But "it may not be the 'shellfish' per se
which increased the risk for diabetes," Dr. Nita Forouhi, of Addenbrooke's
Hospital, University of Cambridge, noted in an email to Reuters Health.
Rather, the cooking and preparation
methods used in the UK, for example, oils used when frying or butter- and
mayonnaise-based sauces served with shellfish, may increase cholesterol
intake which, in turn, may raise diabetes risk.
Forouhi and colleagues assessed the weekly
intake of shellfish plus white fish such as cod, haddock, sole, and halibut,
or oily fish such as mackerel, kippers, tuna, and salmon, reported by 9,801
men and 12,183 women. The study participants were 40 to 79 years old at the
time and had no history of diabetes.
Over an average of 10 years, 725 of these
men and women developed type 2 diabetes.
Both the lower risk linked with white and
oily fish and the greater risk tied to shellfish intake remained when the
investigators allowed for a range of diabetes risk factors including
physical activity, obesity, alcohol use, and fruit and vegetable intake.
The investigators emphasize that the link
between shellfish intake and diabetes risk requires further investigations
in other populations. This observed link, Forouhi commented, "does not imply
that one is the cause of the other."
The findings on white and oily fish
"reinforce the public health message to consume fish regularly," the
investigators conclude, while the shellfish findings should be studied
further.
SOURCE: Diabetes Care, October 2009.
Cocoa flavanols show promise for diabetic cardiovascular health
Diabetes articles and information
A new study has indicated that cocoa flavanols could help improve blood
vessel health in diabetes patients, potentially offering protection against
cardiovascular complications that standard medication does not.
People who suffer from type
2
diabetes are known to have impaired blood vessel function, which
puts them at higher risk of
cardiovascular disease. Indeed, even when medical treatment such as
insulin addresses the main symptoms of diabetes, as many of two thirds
of sufferers are said to eventually expire as a result of cardiovascular
disease and stroke.
The researchers of the new study, published in the Journal of the
American College of Cardiology, noted that "the overall prognosis is
unfavourable due to deteriorated cardiovascular risk".
This has caused diabetes experts to cast about for new approaches and
lifestyle changes that could help reduce the risk of diabetes
complications.
The team, from Germany and the US, was aware of epidemiological data
that diets rich in flavanols are associated with a reduced
cardiovascular risk. They set out to test the feasibility and efficacy
of a dietary intervention based on daily intake of a flavanol-containing
cocoa beverage on vascular function in diabetes sufferers.
The intervention made use of a beverage prepared by the Cocoapro process
developed by confectionery firm Mars, which is designed to retain more
of the flavanols in cocoa than typical processing methods.
The study was conducted in two parts. The first, a prospective study
involving ten people with type 2 diabetes also taking medication, was
intended to ascertain the immediate effects of the cocoa beverage on
flow-mediated dilation (FMD), the measure of a blood vessel's healthy
ability to relax.
The beverages contained different flavanol levels - either 75mg, 371mg,
or 963 mg. The participants' blood vessel function was measured in the
hours following consumption, and a positive correlation was found
between flavanol dose and immediate FMD improvements.
In the second part of the study 41 adults with type 2 diabetes, also
currently taking medication, were divided into two groups. Members of
one group were given a cocoa beverage containing 321 mg of flavanols
three times a day, for 30 days.
Members of the second group received a control cocoa beverage containing
just 25mg of cocoa flavanol. The two beverages had the same calories,
nutrients and other cocoa compounds, such as caffeine and theobromide.
The researchers saw that the flavanols' immediate effect on FMD was
complemented by a sustained improvement over the 30 day period. Indeed,
a 30 per cent increase in FMD was seen between day one and day 30.
Other measures, such as endothelium-independent responses, blood
pressure, heart rate and glyaemic control were not affected by the
intervention.
The findings have been met with enthusiasm by Mars. Chief scientific
officer Harold Schmitz, PhD, said "the implications with regard to
health and quality of life could be remarkable".
Paul Zimmet, MD, PhD, director of the International Diabetes Institute
in Australia, was also upbeat about the potential.
"While more research is needed, this study shows tremendous potential
for future flavanol-based applications," he said.
Indeed, the study researchers agreed over the need for more science in
this area. They said larger trails are necessary for the full clinical
relevance of flavanol-rich foods to be demonstrated, in the context of
cardiovascular health and disease.
Source:
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 51:2141-2149
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.059
Research points to new way to treat type 2 diabetes
LAURI KUBUITSILE
Correspondent
Three years into a six-year study and
researchers have reported that the standard treatment for patients with type
2 diabetes may have to be turned on its head.
A study at the University of Texas's Southwestern Medical Centre headed
by assistant professor of internal medicine Dr Ildiko Lingvay has shown that
it may be time to include insulin in the first line treatment of type 2
diabetes instead of leaving it as the treatment of last resort. Currently
most doctors when faced with a newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patient start
with exercise and weight loss and if medication is needed the patient is
given the drug metformin, which regulates the level of sugar in the blood
and a variety of other hypoglycaemic agents. Doctors only put patients on
insulin, which must be injected or inhaled, as a last resort. The results of
the ongoing study will appear in a future issue of Diabetes Care.
The study was started with 58 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients
ranging in age from 21 to 70 years old. For the first three weeks of
treatment all were given treatment with insulin and metformin. After the
three weeks, they were divided with one group given a traditional first line
treatment and the second group given insulin and metformin.
The results of the study showed that the insulin group had fewer
hypoglycaemic events, gained less weight and reported high treatment
satisfaction.
Many type 2 diabetes patients bulk at taking insulin. They believe it
causes them to eat more and gain a lot of weight. Also they fear daily
injections. Changes in the monitoring of blood sugar levels and in the
method of delivery of insulin have made things easier for patients who must
inject insulin. Adjusting the dose of insulin to your particular blood sugar
levels and metabolism reduces the need to eat constantly and stops weight
gain.
Tinier needles help with the fear of injecting. Also there are now
devices that allow the inhalation of insulin. The insulin goes to the lungs
and then directly to the blood. It makes the dosing almost as easy as pills.
According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), 3.8 million
people worldwide die from diabetes and related illnesses annually. In only
20 years the number of people with diabetes has exploded from 30 million to
246 million. By 2025 there will be approximately 380 million people living
with diabetes, with the highest increases in new cases occurring in the
developing world. Currently India has the most diabetics at 40.9 million
followed by China with 39.8 million.
Symptoms of type 2 diabetes include frequent urination, increased thirst,
unexplained weight loss, fatigue, blurred vision, headaches and dry mouth.
Often, though, people have no symptoms.
Super-food supplements may raise diabetes risk, shorten lifespan
London, Oct 18 : Super-food supplements may raise the risk of developing
diabetes, experts have warned.
In fact, the supplements, thought to help fight cancer,
can even shorten lifespan, the boffins added.
According to research, the supplements, known as
antioxidants, may interfere with blood glucose levels, which can increase
the risk of type 2 diabetes.
Antioxidants, including vitamins A, C and E, and
selenium are believed to 'mop up' cancer-causing compounds known as free
radicals.
However, a report published in the journal Cell
Metabolism shows low levels of these free radicals appear to protect against
diabetes by helping the body respond to insulin signals.
Professor Tony Tiganis, an expert in cell biology at
Australia's Monash University who led the study, said: 'We think there is a
delicate balance and that too much of a good thing - surprise, surprise -
might be bad.
'I would advise people not to take these supplements
because they could be detrimental.'
Prof Tiganis's team carried out their research on mice
but he said: 'There is other evidence antioxidants might be bad for you.'
|
<< Information >>
KYW's Medical Editor Discusses Diabetes
by KYW’s medical editor Dr. Brian McDonough
The numbers are startling. It’s about 24 million. That’s the number of
Americans who have diabetes today; however, 6 million of them don't know
they have diabetes.
The problem with diabetes is it can cause long term problems, such as kidney
failure, heart disease, neurologic issues, and can even cause blindness. Now
there are several things you can do to reduce your chances of developing
diabetes, but several things you can do even if you have diabetes that can
really help you.
First of all, you should set goals for yourself. Try to figure out what
you can do realistically and go after it. One of the things I often suggest
is to get 30 minutes of exercise each day. But remember, you don’t have to
do it all at once, don't buy into the 'no pain, no gain' theory. Start slow
and build.
You should make better food choices, meaning you should drink water rather
than soda, chose vegetables as a snack instead of cakes and pies. Common
sense is the answer.
Vigorous exercise makes big difference in heart health of seniors: study Diabetes
Provided by: Canadian Press
Written by: Shannon Montgomery, THE CANADIAN
PRESS
Oct. 25, 2009
CALGARY - New research suggests it's never too late for seniors saddled
with Type 2 diabetes and other problems to start turning their health around
through vigorous exercise often recommended only for younger people.
While exercise is touted as a key component of health in people under the
age of 65, the message often trails for people who are later in life, says
Dr. Kenneth Madden, a geriatrician at the University of British Columbia.
Madden decided to see whether aerobic exercise could have the same effect
in what he terms "the worst-case scenario" of patients - those with Type 2
diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol.
"There's a lot of talk about prevention, but everyone
just kind of gives up when people are over 65 and have all these risk
factors. So we decided - can you actually do something at this point?"
He assigned adults between the ages of 65 and 83 to one of two groups.
One group continued to do no exercise at all while those in the other one
engaged in vigorous exercise on treadmills and stationary bicycles for one
hour, three times a week.
The stiffness in their arteries - shown to be a risk factor for heart
attacks and strokes - was measured by monitors on pulse points that checked
how fast a pulse wave moved through their bodies.
After three months, the exercise group had improved the stiffness of
their arteries by about 20 per cent, a large impact in such a short period
of time, says Madden.
The shift was especially surprising because many believed it was too late
for sedentary seniors to be able to change at all.
"It was just assumed it was kind of irreversible at that point, the
damage has been done."
Seniors are often wary about starting aerobic exercise, a fear that is
shared by many others working in health care, he says.
"It's a constant struggle to convince people over 65 that it's safe to do
an exercise program and a struggle with other health-care providers to
convince them that it's not too late and that it's never too late."
It was initially difficult to recruit patients into the study, but once
they started they were quickly hooked, Madden says.
While the study did not measure the effect of the exercise beyond the
arteries, he's heard anecdotally that some of the seniors involved have cut
back on their medication and have felt better overall.
"We had the hardest time getting people out of the study at the end," he
laughs. "They didn't want to stop the intervention, but after a while I
said, 'I'm not running a gym."'
Lindsay Walker, strength and conditioning director at the Eau Claire YMCA
in Calgary, says the gym has several seniors-specific classes.
The important thing is to build up slowly, she says. For example, while
she might build up balance for younger clients by getting them to stand on
balance balls, she would likely start a senior just balancing on one leg on
the floor.
"It's totally never too late to start. Everyone can at least walk, you
know? And from there you can build up."
Madden says seniors wanting to start an exercise program should check
with their family doctor. He also recommends a session or two with a
personal trainer experienced in working with seniors, who can suggest a
proper program.
"The amount of money we spend on drugs and cholesterol-lowering agents
and all these sorts of things, in the context of that, one single session
with a trainer isn't a big-ticket item," he says. "It's $50, compared to
hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of dollars a year on medication."
Madden will present his research Sunday at the 2009 Canadian
Cardiovascular Congress, which is being held in Edmonton. It was published
recently in the journal Diabetes Care.
Skin bacteria different
in diabetic mice
In people with diabetes, wrong microbes on skin could
make wounds slow to heal
HONOLULU – Too much of the wrong type of skin bacteria may keep diabetics
from healing, new research suggests.
People with diabetes have a notoriously hard time healing from skin
wounds. New research on diabetic mice suggests that bacteria normally
present on healthy skin may play a role in wound healing, says Elizabeth
Grice, a researcher at the National Human Genome Research Institute in
Bethesda, Md. Grice presented results of a study comparing bacterial
diversity on the skin of diabetic and normal mice October 23 during the
annual meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics.
The work aims to find out how bacteria and other microorganisms on the
skin — known collectively as the skin microbiome — affect health.
Grice and her colleagues had recently completed a survey of bacteria
populating the skin of healthy people and found a wealth of diversity from
individual to individual and from body part to body part.
At any given time, about 15 percent of diabetes patients will have a
slow-healing wound, Grice says. Previous laboratory work to grow bacteria
from cultures of diabetic wounds revealed that the wounds contain
Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus and
Corynebacterium. But Grice’s survey of healthy skin also found that those
bacteria are a normal part of the healthy skin microbiome.
In order to find out how the microbes in the wounds of diabetic mice
differ from those in the wounds of healthy animals, Grice compared bacteria
from the skin of diabetic mice with those from the skin of the mice’s
healthy siblings. The researchers first shaved the backs of both types of
mice and found that the diabetic mice have inflamed, fragile skin.
Sequencing DNA from swabs taken from the mice showed that diabetic mice have
40 times more bacteria on their skin than healthy mice, but fewer types of
microbes.
The researchers then used a skin punch, like those used by dermatologists
to take a skin sample, to make a small wound on the mice’s backs. As the
wounds healed, the team collected bacteria and skin samples to find out how
the population of bacteria and the mice’s response to the wound changed over
time.
Wounds in normal mice healed in about two weeks, but healing took nearly
a month for the wounds on diabetic mice. Even after the wounds healed, the
skin around the wound site was inflamed in the diabetic mice, but not in the
normal mice, the researchers found.
The diabetic mice had higher levels of Staphylococcus and other
rod-shaped bacteria, such as Aerococcus and Weissella, in their wounds, the
team discovered. The injury sites in normal mice had increased levels of
Clostridium and Streptococcus bacteria. These types of bacteria may occupy
an important niche in healthy animals. Either the bacteria keep out other
types of bacteria just by their presence, or they make compounds that would
fight off bacteria that could prevent healing or cause infection, Grice
says. “If you leave that niche wide open, it leaves room for something else
to come in,” she says.
Grice’s team also found different immune responses to the wounds.
Diabetic mice make altered levels of antimicrobial compounds and of immune
and inflammatory chemicals compared with their healthy siblings.
Grice doesn’t yet know whether the shifts in microbes lead to impaired
wound healing or are a result of slow healing or other differences in the
skin of diabetics. She hasn’t yet sampled bacteria in diabetic people.
But the study may lead to improved therapies for treating wounds in
people who have diabetes.
“Although the enormous
population of bacteria on the human body outnumbers even our own cells,
their exact contribution in physiology and pathogenesis is ill defined,”
says John Lambris, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania
School of Medicine in Philadelphia. The new study, “provides an
important step towards linking the diversity of microbial distribution
in diabetic wounds and their role in healing, thus providing a potential
therapeutic target.
Diabetes Drug Promotes Weight Loss
Liraglutide Not Yet Approved in U.S.
By
Salynn Boyles
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by
Louise Chang, MD
Oct. 22, 2009 -- The injectable diabetes drug liraglutide appears to help
obese people who do not have diabetes shed extra pounds, but larger studies
are needed to prove its safety and effectiveness for
weight loss, researchers say.
Liraglutide has been approved for the treatment of
type 2 diabetes in Europe, but it is not yet approved for use in the
United States.
In earlier studies, diabetes patients who received once-daily injections
of the drug lost weight and showed improvements in blood sugar.
In the newly published study, overweight people without diabetes who
received daily injections of liraglutide lost more weight than patients
treated with the oral
weight loss drug
orlistat, sold as Xenical and Alli in the U.S.
Liraglutide belongs to the same class of drugs as the
diabetes treatment Byetta, which has also been shown to promote weight
loss.
The mechanism by which the drugs affect weight is not completely
understood, but they are believed to suppress appetite and delay the
movement of food from the stomach to the small intestine. The thinking is
that this helps people feel full longer after eating.
Liraglutide and Weight Loss and Diabetes
The 20-week weight loss study included 564 obese people with body mass
indexes (BMI) of between 30 and 40, treated at 19 sites throughout Europe.
Participants received either daily injections of one of four doses of
liraglutide, injections of an inactive placebo, or the weight loss drug
orlistat taken orally three times a day.
All the study participants followed calorie-restricted
diets, which contained about 500 fewer calories a day than they needed
to maintain their weight. They also increased their
physical activity.
By the end of the study, the liraglutide-treated patients had lost
significantly more weight than either the placebo-treated patients or those
who took the oral weight loss drug.
Orlistat-treated patients lost an average of 9 pounds during the 20-week
study, compared to a weight loss of 10.5 pounds in patients on the lowest
dose of liraglutide (1.2 milligrams a day).
Patients treated with the highest dose of the liraglutide (3 milligrams
daily) lost the most weight, averaging nearly 16 pounds. These patients also had the most
nd vomiting, with 3.5% of participants withdrawing from the
study as a result of these side effects.
Placebo-treated patients lost the least amount of weight -- about 6
pounds.
The study was paid for by liraglutide manufacturer Novo Nordisk, which
has also provided independent financial support to several study authors.
Weight Loss and diabetes & What is Diabetes
Researchers say longer studies will be needed to determine the drug’s
long-term risk-benefit profile as a weight loss treatment.
Novo Nordisk Chief Science Officer Mads Krogsgaard Thomsen tells WebMD
the company will decide whether to go ahead with larger studies once the FDA
decides whether or not to approve liraglutide for use as a diabetes
treatment in the U.S.
That decision is expected by the end of the year.
“The study published today in Lancet is encouraging, but it is important
to stress that this is only phase II data,” Thomsen says.
Weight loss researcher George A. Bray, MD, tells WebMD that it remains to
be seen if people will embrace a weight loss drug that they have to inject,
even if it proves to be more effective than approved oral treatments.
Patients who take Byetta inject the drug twice a day; liraglutide is
given once a day.
“My guess is that there will be much longer acting versions of both these
drugs in the future that will require much less frequent injections,” Bray
says. “But it still isn’t clear if people who aren’t used to injections will
take shots to lose weight.”
Novo Nordisk is now testing a drug similar to liraglutide that is
injected once a week instead of once a day.
Bray would also like to see studies to determine if combining Byetta or
liraglutide with approved weight loss drugs leads to bigger weight loss than
has been reported with any of the drugs alone.
“It is clear that (Byetta
and liraglutide) promote weight loss in diabetes patients,” he says.
“But their safety and usefulness for weight loss in people without
diabetes remains to be proven.”
ScienceDaily (Oct. 19, 2009) — Children who have had an
episode of diabetic ketoacidosis, a common complication of diabetes, may
have persistent memory problems, according to a new study from researchers
at the UC Davis Center for Mind and Brain.
Diabetic ketoacidosis occurs when the body is lacking
insulin and burns fat for energy instead of sugar. Apart from nausea,
vomiting and fatigue, patients can feel mentally sluggish. If the condition
is not treated, patients may fall into a coma. The new study, published
online Oct. 15 in the Journal of Pediatrics, shows that children known to
have had such an episode in the past performed worse on memory tests than
children with diabetes who had not had such an episode.
Diabetic ketoacidosis -- and its consequences -- can be
avoided with proper glucose control in patients known to have diabetes, said
Simona Ghetti, associate professor at the UC Davis Department of Psychology
and the Center for Mind and Brain. Many cases, however, occur at the time of
diagnosis of diabetes and these cases are more difficult to detect early.
"These results underscore the importance of maintaining
control of known diabetes and prompt diagnosis of new cases should diabetic
ketoacidosis symptoms arise," Ghetti said.
The UC Davis researchers studied 33 children with type
1 diabetes and a history of diabetic ketoacidosis, and 29 diabetic children
with no history of such an episode. They compared the children's ability to
recall events and associations, as measured by simple tests.
Children with a history of ketoacidosis performed
significantly worse on the memory tests than children without a history,
they found.
The results back up anecdotal accounts from parents,
who complain of slight but consistent memory deficits in their children with
type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes that are not captured by IQ measures or
other typical assessments, such as school grades, Ghetti said.
Co-authors on the paper are UC Davis psychology
graduate students Joshua Lee and Dana DeMaster; Nicole Glaser, associate
professor of pediatrics at UC Davis; and Clare Sims, graduate student at the
University of Colorado at Boulder.
The work
was supported by a Young Investigator Research Award to Ghetti from the
Children's Miracle Network.
|